Wednesday, March 16, 2011
In Response To The Livers
When we started giving out awards in 1986, the major ones were trophies. I fell behind in the 1990's and stopped giving out the hardware. I have most of the trophies and am going to slowly update them. When Ian Parfrey was awarded the Bill Weinberg MVP, that was the very trophy last given out to Phil Kotik in 1995. I noticed that more than one of the winter meetings bloggers suggested that my scratching Ian's name into metal with a fork was some sort of trick, conjecturing that I had Ian's name put on the trophy before the meeting. The truth is that my mother often over-cooked beef and, as a child, out of necessity, I learned to press down very hard with my fork.
Josh Balsam is in charge of keeping the captain's records.
We adopted the scoring guideline that "any hit ball which a player with normal effort and average skills should field, but does not should be awarded an error." Ian is correct that this gives a "break" to the pitcher who gets the hitter to pop out but the rightfielder is too busy watching the lithe Japanese girl with long, flowing hair, wearing a mini-kilt, knee socks and a form-fit white blouse unbuttoned to her navel walk by and lets the ball drop in for a hit.
What I'm about to write will, necessarily, disparage many of our players. I don't like doing this, but it seems the only way to properly point out the disadvantages of Sal's egalitarian movement.
The first point to be made is that two-thirds of our games last season resulted in score differentials of 3-runs or less. Given the low quality of our skills (by professional baseball standards) this is remarkable. As those of you who play in other leagues probably know, the blow-out (4 runs differential or more) is the norm. This is because the competition is uneven. How do we accomplish such successful games with players like Havelock Hewes, David Rosengard and Charlie Block and only three real shortstops who only show up half the time? We do it by finding positions like pitcher, catcher and firstbase for those
with little range and by keeping Phil Ciccone and David Sommers at shortstop for the entire game. Our new rule requiring sitting as evenly as possible without playing just thirds of an inning (now I'm giving Sal another idea) will mean that Gil Schmerler will be moving over to shortstop for an inning and Josh Balsam will be at thirdbase. The result of a few easy grounders is a major rally. Also, though Freddie Melendez claims it is "easy" to substitute 13 players evenly into a game, I bet he won't be able to do it. I sat down and made two typical 13-player line-ups and it took me 15-minutes in a quiet room to figure it out.
One other reason we get even games is that we design the teams to be equal. This is largely my responsibility and I do it very well. Sal's suggestion that we allow two random captains to choose-up is a mistake. Though we have had some stellar games with choosing-up (I'm thinking of one game when Seung and I were captains) the typical result is a blow-out. Remember that the random captains are the same people who gave Marvin Cohen a gold glove. Beyond mutual stupidity is the possibility that one of the captains is better at assessing talent than the other or has more information than the other and gets a much better team. In fact, the very goal of choosing-up is to get the better team. Isn't it better to create teams with the goal of being even?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Havelock,
I think that putting down people's votes is out of line. Those that voted for Marvin did so because he is the player who most often plays that position by a WIDE margin. He also makes the plays asked of him, catching the balls thrown to him on target, etc. No other player plays that position one-tenth as much as he does and therefore it would be difficult to vote for someone not seen at that position by many players.
I understand and appreciate that you are successful at creating balanced teams. Also, as I can understand from the posts from the last couple of days, I dislike the new substitution rule. As I pushed for at the meeting, everyone should sit for an inning if there are sufficient people to allow for it--but the rule which forces rotational sitting will not help the quality of the game. as a manager, I would like to determine when I choose to sit my shortstop (or other players) based on situation and not based on how many innings everyone else has sat. There may be a situation where I choose to sit a player two innings early before I sit another player for the first time. In my mind, it is in the end a rule that will not accomplish its aims. My proposed rule would have balanced competition and democracy/fairness in game playing.
Yes shortstop is da hardest position bt da guys that re against sitting should not even come n im sorry bt da truth is we re all equal . I left alot of teams because of da pre modonas of my teams. N it shoudnt happen now n that im against . Back to da shortstops we have plenty there's me zack alex derek nell ion should I continue?? N yes I love being captain so ur give me an even team n i will do what's I do best n lead my team to wins bt only if ur want to . I freddie dagame except da challenge mr. havie . Ur da man
Sitting a team of 13 evenly: The pitcher doesn't sit, so it's really 12. Three people sit 1st and 5th, 2nd and 6th, 3rd and 7th, and your best players in the 4th. This can be mixed up a little, i.e. the best players can be sat in the 2nd, which probably makes more sense.
With a team of 12, people sit in pairs until the 6th inning when the last player sits as well as one earlier player, and the 7th inning can be done any number of ways.
With a team of 11, seven people sit once.
And yes, how are managers going to be able to keep track of this? It's a lot to ask. Maybe this comment should be printed out and distributed to the managers at the start of a game.
Added burden on managers plus more innings for poor fielders equal longer, sloppier games. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I think once we start playing crowded games on a tight schedule at Heckscher, it's going to be fucking brutal.
Prove to me this won't slow down the game significantly, and I'll get behind it. Otherwise, I'm in favor of Hav using the divine right of commissioners to just make this rule go away.
This is Havelock:
Thanks for doing the math for us, Ian. I would add that beyond figuring out how many players and in what innings, there is the question of where players are inserted. When I tried it with a typical list of our players it necessitated several movements of players on the diamond, so that a few guys were playing three or four positions.
From Derek:
I agree with the way Havelock does it and I am not in favor of everyone needing to sit and equal amount of innings in order to be fair or treated equal. As the manager or a pitcher you want to win the games. Additionally, this league has evolved over the years where we are playing more and more games yearly then previously noted. Everyone gets to sit and is not excluded, but if I am trying to get a win a might manage the sitting differently to position the better fielders and appropriate times of the games. Additionally, we are all human and not professional players where we are immune to errors. We all make them from the Ian's to the Phil's to the Marvin's. Havelock, Tony and the grandfather's of this league have been doing a great job with the selection of teams to the flow of the games for over 25 years. We have tweaked some rules here and there but this league is fine just the way it has been.
Happy St. Patrick's Day...
By the way, you probably noticed the Asian girl football league that had the other half of East 10th Street this fall. Holy shit. Me and Freddie blew at least a play each watching them. But that isn't an error. You can't imply that a fielder choosing to watch a beautiful woman instead of the ball is in any way a mistake.
In Canada, the land of nice and fair, we sit down as many as 3 players each inning by batting order. eg. 1st 3 and 2nd 3, etc. This makes the batting lineup as important as the fielding lineup. But we sometimes have up to 18 players on a team.
Bobby
From Derek:
Softball is played in Canada, WOW!!! Hey Bobby, how you doing? I really hope you come down and make an appearance one weekend. It would be nice to catch up.
dallasdee24@yahoo.com
Havelock here:
Hi, Bobby! Glad you're still with us in ciberspace. If you ever get back to New York you know where to find us.
Post a Comment